CCNA Pt. – 21

These are examples of long out put text that shouldn’t be super complicated to remember but im still sort of struggling with them. This should be most that are covered on the test. Sometimes there are context clues which Ill try and point out.

This one, says “show Interface” counters. I mean, that’s a huge block of text to have to scroll through quickly when considering 450 questions…. to be fair

Every answer says something about IP so the listing of IP isnt helpful. it does says Routing Protocol toward the middle though followed by BGP 18. Im not sure what BGP 18 means, lets find out

no idea

There is nothing here that says what it is but I guess I can remember this one…

This is where they get you. It’s obviously something to do with mac addresses but it could be interfaces because it says “vlan” in front, right? Let me think if this is right, i mean, a switch can have virtual mac addresses, they exist, right?

Per this https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/switch-mac-address/td-p/1378516 it looks like show interface mac to get local mac addresses doesnt really make sense and show mac isnt in a real command. Which it very clearly states in the answer text but you know, research. Anyway, I think I got this one.

Show standby and show standby brief, confusing.
https://networklessons.com/cisco/ccie-routing-switching/hsrp-hot-standby-routing-protocol

This is actually a helpful page! Generally speaking, there is not a lot off useful info on the CCNA stuff,,,, anywhere.

So this is what show standby looks like on that router. The grouping of the text isnt as tight, which I find slightly less confusin

Honestly, I’m pretty sure I didn’t catch every single question like this but I did get a get amount of them. I think this is all for now. Tomorrow im going to attempt a longer study session after applying for more jobs and doing follow ups. Kind of hoping to land this spot with Warner but I have a feeling its not going to work out. I had an interview with the CDC and im not going into details but I feel like, it involved a local politician and may not have actually been a real thing. Again, I could be totally jumping to conclusions on that but it was like a 3rd shift SOC type of role? Who knows.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: